[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-shim6-proto-00.txt



Another missing discussion: the document refers to
SCTP as if it would be obvious how it can use Shim6. I'm
not sure that's the case. Or at least its not obvious to me :-)
Just a minor point here - I'm assuming that SCTP would work over Shim6 if an 
SCTP implementation was Shim6-unaware; the "IPv6 addresses" included in SCTP 
Init and Init-ACK chunks would work even if a Shim6 added locators for these 
identifiers "under the covers".
I've been seeing references to "turning Shim6 OFF for SCTP", since SCTP is 
capable of handling its own multihoming, but I don't think anything is 
particularly BROKEN if SCTP is naively using identifiers as if they were 
locators. My understanding is that we're talking about efficiency, not 
correct operation, when we talk about Shim6 and SCTP in this context.
As Jari pointed out, Shim6 is closely tied to IPv6, but I note that SCTP 
supports both IPv4 and IPv6 multihoming - this could be an incentive to use 
SCTP instead of Shim6 for multihoming (if both are available, and if there's 
a knob to "turn Shim6 OFF for SCTP").
Do others have a different understanding?

Spencer