thanks for the minutes,
Just a comment. the minutes state that:
3. HBA update
[Marcelo Bagnulo, presented by Geoff Huston]
o The -01 version of the document references the 3484
proposals and CGA extensions as normative, so they will be lock-stepped
in the publication process.
The hba document does not includes the update to RFC3484 as a normative
reference.
The hba document does includes two drafts as normative references:
[6] Bagnulo, M. and J. Arkko, "Cryptographically Generated Addresses
(CGA) Extension Field Format", draft-bagnulo-shim6-cga-ext-02
(work in progress), October 2005.
[7] Nordmark, E., "Level 3 multihoming shim protocol",
draft-ietf-shim6-proto-01 (work in progress), October 2005.
The first one is needed in order to have a consistent format in the cga
extensions
The second one, i included mostly to be sure that everything runs
smoothly between the shim protocol and the hba mechanisms, so that they
move together
regards, marcelo
El 13/11/2005, a las 19:00, Geoff Huston escribió:
With these fancy new tools at the IETF we can now post interim
material to the IETF and revise it in place. So rather than circulate
the minutes, collect comments and then submit a final version to the
IETF Secretariat, this way we can post the initial draft of the
minutes and make revisions in situ if needed.
The material for IETF64 is at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/meeting_materials.cgi? meeting_num=64
You'll find the reference SHIM6 in the Internet area of that web page
of course, and the minutes at
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05nov/minutes/shim6.html
If you have any comments on the minutes, please send them to this
mailing list please.
thanks,
Geoff & Kurtis