|
I'm not sure what the "costs" are in this
statement. Are we just saying that we're balancing the processing time to figure
out that we no longer have to encapsulate against the encapsulation overhead? or
are you thinking of something else?
Spencer
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:55
AM
Subject: Re: Review comments on
draft-ietf-shim6-proto-03.txt
Hi Geoff and all,
On 1/16/06, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
wrote:
[...]
> 9 - section 11 - Sending ULP payloads
>
> As a meta consideration here, is there any logical reason to prefer
the
> initial ULIDs as locators?
For what it's worth, I
don't think that this belongs within the protocol. The protocol should make it
possible (maybe via a negotiation), but the decision needs to be left to the
hosts (and their parameters/options). They might want it in some cases and in
some cases not. It depends on the 'costs' associated with the ULID pairs.
Pierre.
|