[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]

To: "Jason Schiller (schiller@uu.net)" <jason.schiller@mci.com>
Subject: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
From: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:19:31 -0400
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, shim6-wg <shim6@psg.com>, iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0604132210490.18976-100000@meno.corp.us.uu.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0604132210490.18976-100000@meno.corp.us.uu.net>


On 13-Apr-2006, at 22:12, Jason Schiller (schiller@uu.net) wrote:

That being the case, then in the long term do we need analturnative tomulti-homing that does not use de-aggrgegation and that has fullsupport
for TE?

I'm not yet convinced of what TE is required, and in whatcircumstances, in some future where there are alternatives to multi-homing with PI/covered-PA addresses.

Joe

References:
- Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
  - From: "Jason Schiller (schiller@uu.net)" <jason.schiller@mci.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Next by Date: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Previous by thread: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Next by thread: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread