[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]

To: shim6-wg <shim6@psg.com>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:21:12 -0400
Cc: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0604132210490.18976-100000@meno.corp.us.uu.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0604132210490.18976-100000@meno.corp.us.uu.net>

On Apr 13, 2006, at 10:12 PM, Jason Schiller (schiller@uu.net) wrote:

That being the case, then in the long term do we need analturnative tomulti-homing that does not use de-aggrgegation and that has fullsupport
for TE?

Do you honestly believe the size of the routing table is the biggestchallenge to 'cheap' hardware pushing 100s of billions of bits persecond?


--
TTFN,
patrick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

References:
- Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
  - From: "Jason Schiller (schiller@uu.net)" <jason.schiller@mci.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Next by Date: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Previous by thread: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Next by thread: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread