[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shipping SHIM6 spec to IESG or not question per ULID Security

To: <shim6@psg.com>
Subject: Shipping SHIM6 spec to IESG or not question per ULID Security
From: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:31:31 -0400
In-reply-to: <13dad58a62ad81866de01c1153e3abd6@it.uc3m.es>

Shim6 Chairs,

Process Check.

I think the point now is there is WG significant interest in pursuing
the security discussion thus shipping shim6 to IESG with HBA as current
in the spec or the effect to IPsec is not optimal.  Unless we remove it
from the spec currently.

/jim

References:
- Re: CGA Use with HBA in Shim6 IETF Meeting July 10, 2006
  - From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>

Prev by Date: RE: CGA Use with HBA in Shim6 IETF Meeting July 10, 2006
Next by Date: Re: CGA Use with HBA in Shim6 IETF Meeting July 10, 2006
Previous by thread: Re: CGA Use with HBA in Shim6 IETF Meeting July 10, 2006
Next by thread: Re: CGA Use with HBA in Shim6 IETF Meeting July 10, 2006
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread