Re: CGA Use with HBA in Shim6 IETF Meeting July 10, 2006

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 19-jul-2006, at 23:31, Francis Dupont wrote:

> >    Also, I think it would make sense to do the shim negotiation  
> > inside a
> >    TLS protected TCP session, which should handle all the packet size
> >    issues.

> => as TLS is in fact a session protocol this idea is good. The only
> issue is it can work only when TLS is used... Unfortunately IMHO
> we need a protocol at the network layer, no transport (aka SCTP) or
> session (aka TLS) even it is more (too?) easy.

Why??