Re: Security Module for shim6 or hip really

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

> well, what we have in the current protocol is that the Locator List
> Option Format has a one octet of Verification Method per locator
> included in the option, so that we can specify the mechanism used to
> validate each of the locators (currently only HBA and CGA methods are
> defined in the draft)

Ah, I missed that. This may be enough.

> however, it is not obvious at this point what a host can do if the
> validation method for the locators is not supported. 

Behave as if you did not support multihoming for this set of locators?

But it is necessary to let the other end know about this.

--Jari