Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-shim6-applicability-03.txt

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>]

On 2007-07-17 22:07, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> thanks for the feedback
>
> El 17/07/2007, a las 11:59, Brian E Carpenter escribió:
>
> > This draft looks good to me on content; the English needs a
> > check.
>
> If you could be more specific on this i could try to fix it...

I was assuming that Joe would make a pass over it as co-author;
there's nothing serious for people used to Euroenglish :-)

> > One comment:
> >
> > > 4.3.  Traffic Engineering
> > ...
> > >               There is no defined mechanism which would allow use of
> > >    the Locator Preferences option amongst a site full of hosts to be
> > >    managed centrally.
> >
> > It might be worth noting that RFC 4384 policy is also available
> > as a primitive TE tool, with at least one mechanism for site-wide
> > distribution of that policy existing in draft.
>
> ok, we can include some text about this in the next version

Thanks.

> One more question: do you think we should include other sections or 
> address other issues in here? For instance, one option would be to 
> "borrow" some text on application considerations from Erik expired 
> drafts and describe the referrals, call backs and so on. Imho these are 
> interesting conclusions we achieved in this work, and i would like to 
> reflect them somewhere...

Yes, discussing referrals would be very useful IMHO. Somewhere we
had responses to all the RFC 3582 goals, and those could possibly be
useful too.

    Brian