[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6to4 relays [Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)]



At Wed, 11 Sep 2002 03:59:41 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> >> We are still missing an RFC really analysing host-based 6to4,
> >> and until that work has been done we don't know what is bogus.
> > a new work item for the v6ops WG?
> 
> how is this different from what shipworm is trying to solve?

Shipworm has a lower required density of global IPv4 addresses;
host-based-6to4 has less reliance on middleboxes.