RE: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

clearly making the tsp spec (converged marc/fred) is our mission.
and setting up explicit tunnels is required for deployment right now.

the key is if the chairs can bless this work and say lets go and do tsp.  Or if I were marc and fred I would be hard pressed into putting a lot of work into this.

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Love [mailto:lha@stacken.kth.se]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:58 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Pekka Savola; Marc Blanchet; huitema@microsoft.com;
> satapati@cisco.com; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc
> 
> 
> "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com> writes:
> 
> > Marc did explicitly ask that TSP be a v6ops mechanism for 
> discussion.
> > 
> > To address that question with my input.
> > 
> > I believe TSP is an important tool for users.  I believe we 
> can begin
> > work on this tool within v6ops and support it being worked 
> on within this
> > list.
> > 
> > Others should respond here with your opinion and this is 
> important per
> > Margarets talk today.  One way or the other.
> 
> There are issues with tsp-draft as it is today, I've sent 
> some comments to
> the authors.
> 
> I think tsp is good tool when you want to set up explicit tunnels.
> 
> Love
>