[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc



Jim,

What do you mean by "send individual IDs for tools to v6ops"?

Anyone can submit an individual ID, but v6ops may not adopt a work
item (i.e. publish a WG ID) that isn't covered in our charter.

Margaret


At 02:30 PM 9/19/02, Bound, Jim wrote:
Margaret,

OK. So the general Internet community cannot send individual IDs for tools to v6ops?
I view tsp as tool not as transition mechanism?

thanks
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:mrw@windriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 2:20 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Love; Pekka Savola; Marc Blanchet; huitema@microsoft.com;
> satapati@cisco.com; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc
>
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> >the key is if the chairs can bless this work and say lets go and do
> >tsp. Or if I were marc and fred I would be hard pressed
> into putting a
> >lot of work into this.
>
> It isn't covered in our charter to "bless" any new transition
> mechanisms
> work unless/until the need for a new mechanism is identified
> and document
> in the scenario/analysis effort.
>
> If we keep pushing on the analysis documents, I hope we will get to a
> point in the next few months where we do have consensus to start work
> on some of the needed transition mechanisms. But, we aren't there
> yet.
>
> We will also need to make sure that we understand how the
> existing transition
> mechanisms RFCs do/don't fit together, so that we understand
> the impact
> of introducing new mechanisms into the overall architecture.
>
> Margaret
>
>
>
>
>
>
>