RE: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

Margaret,

OK.  So the general Internet community cannot send individual IDs for tools to v6ops?
I view tsp as tool not as transition mechanism?

thanks
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:mrw@windriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 2:20 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Love; Pekka Savola; Marc Blanchet; huitema@microsoft.com;
> satapati@cisco.com; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> >the key is if the chairs can bless this work and say lets go and do 
> >tsp.  Or if I were marc and fred I would be hard pressed 
> into putting a 
> >lot of work into this.
> 
> It isn't covered in our charter to "bless" any new transition 
> mechanisms
> work unless/until the need for a new mechanism is identified 
> and document
> in the scenario/analysis effort.
> 
> If we keep pushing on the analysis documents, I hope we will get to a
> point in the next few months where we do have consensus to start work
> on some of the needed transition mechanisms.  But, we aren't there
> yet.
> 
> We will also need to make sure that we understand how the 
> existing transition
> mechanisms RFCs do/don't fit together, so that we understand 
> the impact
> of introducing new mechanisms into the overall architecture.
> 
> Margaret
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>