Re: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc

[Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>]

    Date:        Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:17:05 +0900
    From:        itojun@iijlab.net
    Message-ID:  <20020923141705.BC2174B22@coconut.itojun.org>

  | 	IIRC a couple of IETFs ago Alain was arguing that the check shouldn't
  | 	be applied, for some reasons.

I don't know why Alain argued against that, but I also would.

Erik.Nordmark@sun.com said:
   | If we discard the need for IPv6-native to communicate with 6to4 sites

We can't do that - the only reason for having a 6to4 site is to be able
to communicate with the rest of the IPv6 universe.   We can't restrict that
to the subset of that universe who are using 6to4.

kre