Re: ocean: do not boil

[itojun@iijlab.net]

>  > The same approach would "work" for large v6 clouds, but the result
>  > would not be useful, because it'd require so many IPv4 
>  > addresses that
>  > there'd be no point to the exercise.
>=> Wouldn't it require the same number of addresses?
>Eventually you are translating from a private (be it
>v6 or 1918 addresses) space to public one. The public
>space would need public v4 addresses. So I'm not sure
>why you would run out of addresses in one case but not
>the other.

	you can run IPv4 with NAT, and IPv6 globally-routable, on the same cloud.
	we don't need to fix IPv4 problem people are having - and better, IPv6
	will be able to provide a better applications experience than IPv4 with
	NAT.

itojun