[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ocean: do not boil

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: ocean: do not boil
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:44:40 -0400
Cc: "Hesham Soliman (EAB)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>, "'Bob Hinden'" <hinden@IPRG.nokia.com>, Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Bob Fink <fink@es.net>, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 06:46:28 -0700
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com

> >   > p2p applications can be designed to use intermediaries,
> >   > just like SMTP and HTTP. If I was designing an apps
> >   > protocol today, I would definitely make sure it could
> >   > be relayed between address spaces at applications level.
> >
> > => Are we in a position to mandate this?
> >
> 
> This is the Internet, so no. But we (or if we were lucky the IAB)
> could make an architectural recommendation.

It would strike me as extremely bizarre for the IAB to recommend 
that P2P applications define their own addressing system and 
routing protocols when IPv6 offers reasonably good ones.

Prev by Date: Re: ocean: do not boil
Next by Date: Re: quality of v6 connections [Re: unmanaged scope comments]
Previous by thread: Re: ocean: do not boil
Next by thread: RE: ocean: do not boil
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread