RE: ocean: do not boil

["Hesham Soliman (EAB)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>]

  > 	"10 million subscriber" scenario is nontrivial by nature.
  > 
  > 	for (a), 10.0.0.0/8 space only servers 17 million subscribers
  > 	(theoretical maximum), and since address alloation 
  > efficiency is not
  > 	that good, you can't have a single NAT cloud.  you need to split
  > 	customers into multiple NAT clouds (also I don't think 
  > any single
  > 	NAT box can take traffic from 10 million subscribers).
  > 
  > 	even for (b), I don't think single NAT-PT box (Alain, 
  > forget about
  > 	DNSSEC for now) can take traffic from 10 million 
  > subscribers, so we
  > 	at least need to split NAT-PT load to multiple NAT-PT 
  > box somehow.
  > 	(i assume the customers will want to use IPv4-only 
  > yahoo.com.cn, right?)
  > 
  > 	so if we need to take a pick, it is between (a) IPv4 
  > multiple NAT cloudm	and global IPv6, or (b) global IPv6 and 
  > multiple NAT-PT.

=> Fully agree. But there is a big difference:
The multiple NAT-PT cloud will not having overlapping
addresses, which makes for a simpler routing.

Hesham


  > 
  > itojun
  >