[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed 6to4 work (security)

To: itojun@iijlab.net
Subject: Re: Proposed 6to4 work (security)
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:35:46 +0200
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 01:37:32 -0700
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

hi,

On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:27:04PM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> 	- can chew up bandwidth of the 6to4 public relay router provider, and
> 	  there's no way for an ISP to limit accesses to the relay router
> 	  to their customers (it has to be public service to everyone)

It would be possible to restrict access by just not announcing the relay 
addresses (unicast or anycast) into the "public network".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  48282  (47686)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed 6to4 work
Next by Date: Re: Proposed 6to4 work (security)
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed 6to4 work (security)
Next by thread: Re: Proposed 6to4 work (security)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread