Re: 3gpp transition solutions, revision -02

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

"Hesham Soliman (EAB)" wrote:
> 
>   > > => In theory, yes. But we need to get an IP n IP profile
>   > > for ROHC. Pretty easily done.
>   > >
>   >
>   > ok, and that sounds better than using translation mechanisms.
> 
> => Sorry, I don't think this has anything to do with replacing
> translation. We're talking about two different cases. I was
> trying to explain that tunnelling overhead, over the air interface
> can be removed with ROHC. That doesn't mean that IPv6 UEs will
> not talk to IPv4 UEs.

What is the plan for apps that are broken by NAT? Won't the
supported apps be relatively few, and better handled by dual stack
application proxies than by NAT-PT?

   Brian