[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: API Discussion RE: v6ops Agenda for Atlanta
> It is true that we did discuss the IPv4 mapped address issues in
> Sunnyvale. At that time,
> Itojun presented one draft that concerned two different
> parts of the
> issue: what should and
> shouldn't be sent on the wire, and what should and
> shouldn't be passed by
> the API,
> particularly in a dual stack.
>
> There was some agreement in the meeting that there are
> issues with using
> IPv4 mapped
> addresses on the wire that need to be documented, although
> it was not clear
> what action we
> should recommend to correct these issues -- updating the
> IPv6 addressing
> architecture,
> modifying SIIT, etc.
=> I would not say we agreed on this, I for one don't
think the scenarios presented by Itojun as valid. I
believe others made the same comment.
Hesham