RE: API Discussion RE: v6ops Agenda for Atlanta

["Hesham Soliman (EAB)" <hesham.soliman@era.ericsson.se>]

  > It is true that we did discuss the IPv4 mapped address issues in 
  > Sunnyvale.   At that time,
  > Itojun presented one draft that concerned two different 
  > parts of the 
  > issue:  what should and
  > shouldn't be sent on the wire, and what should and 
  > shouldn't be passed by 
  > the API,
  > particularly in a dual stack.
  > 
  > There was some agreement in the meeting that there are 
  > issues with using 
  > IPv4 mapped
  > addresses on the wire that need to be documented, although 
  > it was not clear 
  > what action we
  > should recommend to correct  these issues -- updating  the 
  > IPv6 addressing 
  > architecture,
  > modifying SIIT, etc.

=> I would not say we agreed on this, I for one don't 
think the scenarios presented by Itojun as valid. I
believe others made the same comment.

Hesham