[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

transition mechanism (tunnel MTU) comment

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: transition mechanism (tunnel MTU) comment
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:04:35 +0900
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:27:43 -0800
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org

	on non-dynamic case, for me,
	- 1280 MTU is fine
	- 4400 MRU is fine compromise.  i would like to see smaller number,
	  but 4400 is okay.

itojun

Follow-Ups:
- Re: transition mechanism (tunnel MTU) comment
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
- Re: transition mechanism (tunnel MTU) comment
  - From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
Next by Date: firewalling points
Previous by thread: Fw: Transition Scenarios for ISP Networks
Next by thread: Re: transition mechanism (tunnel MTU) comment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread