[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt

To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
From: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:19:00 +0100
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:20:26 -0800
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
In-reply-to: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1037554714.7287.nordmark@bebop.france>; from Erik.Nordmark@sun.com on Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:38:34PM +0100
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211141248270.1507-100000@netcore.fi> <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1037554714.7287.nordmark@bebop.france>
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

As Dave said at the meeting, I believe MTU of 1280 might be a problem
for MIP. It might also be a problem when doing multicast and sending
PIM register messages.

Stig

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
  - From: "Fred L. Templin" <ftemplin@IPRG.nokia.com>

References:
- Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

Prev by Date: Fw: Transition Scenarios for ISP Networks
Next by Date: transition mechanism (tunnel MTU) comment
Previous by thread: Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
Next by thread: Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread