[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt

To: "Fred L. Templin" <ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com>
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:51:48 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@Sun.COM>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 04:58:17 -0800
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
In-reply-to: "Your message with ID" <3DDC4E9A.3060209@iprg.nokia.com>
Reply-to: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@Sun.COM>
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org

> >That is an orthogonal issue.
> >An IPv6 sender that doesn't perform path MTU discovery will only send <=1280
> >bytes as you point out, but the IPv4 reassembly buffer size of >the
> receiver on a tunnel decapsulator is merely a function of how >the
> IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling is done. >
> Yes - unless a dynamic mechanism is used.

My point about orthogonality holds even if a dynamic tunnel MTU is in use.

  Erik

References:
- Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
  - From: "Fred L. Templin" <ftemplin@IPRG.nokia.com>

Prev by Date: my notes from today's v6ops session
Next by Date: isatap-07 draft offered as last-call
Previous by thread: Re: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
Next by thread: RE: (ngtrans) I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ngtrans-mech-v2-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread