[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
> > I simply disagree and strongly do not support this and ask
> the chairs
> > to kill 90% of what you suggest as out of scope for this
> mail list and
> > the IETF.
>
> Such a reply to the perfectly reasonable and well-documented
> draft of Pekka about the current IPv6 situation helps me to
> understand why the IPv6 transition is so slow (I connected my
> employer to the 6bone in 1996 and I saw very little progress
> since). If all the IPv6 zealots believe and act the same,
> IPv6 will stay a small island for many years to come.
>
> If you treat such concerns like you do and with words like
> this one, we will soon only have trolls like Dan Bernstein to
> tell the simple truth about IPv6.
Please see reply I just sent to Pekka. I am saying we should not tell
product developers how to deliver their products in this community it is
not our job here.
Is that better?
I fully agree we need to work on the charter of v6ops. That does not
include making suggestions how my OS handles a printer for IPv6.
Regards,
/jim