[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 6to4 security questions

To: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: 6to4 security questions
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:34:31 +0200 (EET)
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 01:36:24 -0800
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
In-reply-to: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA1D2A25@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Christian Huitema wrote:
> Reading this thread, it seems that many people are confusing several
> aspects of the 6to4 security issue. 

Indeed.

> Maybe we should start by writing a
> complete security analysis, something a bit more detailed than the
> current draft. 

I agree.

I intend to try to do a proper threat analysis as one section of the
draft.  It could very well be a separate draft too.

[...]

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords

References:
- RE: 6to4 security questions
  - From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: RE: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
Previous by thread: Re: 6to4 security questions
Next by thread: Re: 6to4 security questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread