[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion

To: pekkas@netcore.fi
Subject: Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 01:30:28 +0900 (JST)
Cc: Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org, itojun@iijlab.net, jgraessley@apple.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211281807500.12673-100000@netcore.fi>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20021128160602.GI16983@rvdp.org><Pine.LNX.4.44.0211281807500.12673-100000@netcore.fi>

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211281807500.12673-100000@netcore.fi> (at Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:11:03 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> says:

> So?  Bad IPv6 routing happens all the time, for about every non-local 
> destination.  Bad IPv4 routing almost never happens.  They aren't 
> comparable.

IPv6 routing is as stable as IPv4 routing.
Or, they're comparable at least.

What is "Bad routing," BTW?

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
- Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
  - From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
- Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
Previous by thread: Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread