[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion



On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211281807500.12673-100000@netcore.fi> (at Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:11:03 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> says:
> 
> > So?  Bad IPv6 routing happens all the time, for about every non-local 
> > destination.  Bad IPv4 routing almost never happens.  They aren't 
> > comparable.
> 
> IPv6 routing is as stable as IPv4 routing.
> Or, they're comparable at least.

Perhaps in some restricted scope (it certainly is in our network and my 
home network in Finland), but not globally.
 
> What is "Bad routing," BTW?

draft-savola-v6ops-6bone-mess-01.txt

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords