[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPv6 transition architecture discussion
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211281807500.12673-100000@netcore.fi> (at Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:11:03 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> says:
>
> > So? Bad IPv6 routing happens all the time, for about every non-local
> > destination. Bad IPv4 routing almost never happens. They aren't
> > comparable.
>
> IPv6 routing is as stable as IPv4 routing.
> Or, they're comparable at least.
Perhaps in some restricted scope (it certainly is in our network and my
home network in Finland), but not globally.
> What is "Bad routing," BTW?
draft-savola-v6ops-6bone-mess-01.txt
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords