[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request to Publish ISATAP

To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
From: Fred Templin <osprey67@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Cc: itojun@iijlab.net, Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, Bob Fink <bob@thefinks.com>, Randy Bush <randy@iij.com>, osprey67@yahoo.com
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20021224101921.049e65c0@mail.windriver.com>

Margaret,

--- Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com> wrote:
> Let me know if you have any questions about this process.

Thanks for the clear explaination. Your note gave a detailed
roadmap for publication as experimental RFC which I'm certain
can be followed with no further process issues.

> In the meantime, the question on the table is whether ISATAP
> should be published as a standards track document that
> obsoletes part of RFC 2893, which we believe it should not.

I respect the v6ops WG chairs' decision on this, and withdraw
the question of standards-track publication.

Fred Templin
osprey67@yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>

References:
- Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Request to Publish ISATAP
Next by Date: Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
Previous by thread: Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
Next by thread: Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread