[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-cases-01.txt
yep, I only did editorial nits, and tried to make it conformant with the ID nits. However, I did not split the references to normative and informative. The document is going to be Informational, and so I would guess that all references are informative by definition. (This would be my understanding.)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Pekka Savola [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 8:21 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-cases-01.txt
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
> Internet-Drafts directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working
> Group of the IETF.
> > Title : Transition Scenarios for 3GPP Networks
> > Author(s) : J. Soininen
> > Filename : draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-cases-01.txt
> > Pages : 10
> > Date : 2002-12-23
> As the changes were very minor, I'm assuming this is to go to
> W.G. last
> call soonish.
> I'd check it against ID-nits, e.g. the references need to be
> split up or
> Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
> Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords