Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo

[Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   I argue that using tunnel broker and extending it to support UDP tunneling
   across NATs is much better than 6to4 and Teredo when considering the space
   of temporary solutions until the ISPs provide native IPv6.
   
=> congratulations on a such courageous public opinion...
BTW teredo comes from an old discussion about what to standardize
for UDP tunneling across NATs (tunnel server ports for instance).

   And there isn't any risk of creating separate IPv6 native and 6to4
   universes since it is all IPv6 native addresses with regular IPv6 routing.

=> this is my main concern about 6to4.

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr