[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:43:53 +0100
Cc: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>, "'Erik Nordmark'" <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, "'Joshua Graessley'" <jgraessley@apple.com>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:34:07 +0200. <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301180026530.22083-100000@netcore.fi>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   We provide 6to4 relay service to everybody in the world.  There is no way
   we would offer any tunnel brokering (_using our addresses_) outside our
   customers.  6to4 is much more provider-neutral on this aspect, which could 
   also be considered as a good thing!
   
=> many ISPs are very reluctant to run a 6to4 relay so I am not
convinced of the provider-neutral aspect of 6to4... I have no objection
to be a TB-provider customer BTW.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

References:
- RE: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Next by Date: Re: 6to4 security questions
Previous by thread: RE: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Next by thread: RE: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread