[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo




-- samedi, janvier 18, 2003 13:42:41 +0100 Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
wrote/a écrit:

> Pekka Savola [mailto:pekkas@netcore.fi] wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> > There is at least Tunnel Setup Protocol (TSP*) which does automatic
>> > configuration and it'salso quite extendable. On debian for instance
>> > it's "apt-get install freenet6" and you are going. The only 
>> 'problem'
>> > is that the Freenet6 broker system is located in the US 
>> thus european
>> > hosts have some (80ms+) additional latency. A "POP" per ISP would be
>> > better which is something we are pursuing for SixXS. The 
>> TSP protocol
>> > can handle this fortunatly. A POP per ISP would at least mean that
>> > clients can get near-native IPv6.
>> > 
>> > TSP: http://www.freenet6.net/draft-tsp.shtml
>> > It is marked "Expires: November 30, 2001" though, what happened
>> > that it didn't get pushed through?
>> 
>> Folks probably lost hope.
> 
> I rather think it never got completely finished seeing that
> Appendix A mentions "A DTD should be placed here for the protocol."
> etc...

it is finished and code is working. 
again draft on the web site was not updated, but the ietf directory has new
versions of the draft
draft-blanchet-ngtrans-tsp*

> I added Marc to the CC list he can probably best comment on
> what happened and/or what is going on.
> 

Marc.