[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: agenda items for SF ? ISPs document

To: MicklesCK <MicklesCK@aol.com>
Subject: Re: agenda items for SF ? ISPs document
From: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 12:39:55 -0800
Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>, Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
References: <JBEJLMPCJCBCLFPOGGFBMELMCKAA.MicklesCK@aol.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020920Netscape/7.0


MicklesCK wrote:

We do not have an author for the datacenter
section. I propose we drop the additional datacenter section since, as I pointed out at the interim meeting, there
would be overlap with the Enterprise draft.

One point I would like to raise about IPv6 in the datacenter
is load balancers. They basically are NAT boxes dispatching the traffic
to a number of servers. Are we going to need NATv6 afterall?

Anyway, I think this concern is specific to the big datacenter
and should be addressed in the ISP scenario.

   - Alain.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: agenda items for SF ? ISPs document
  - From: "Cleve Mickles" <micklesc@aol.net>
- Re: agenda items for SF ? ISPs document
  - From: Roy Brabson <rbrabson@us.ibm.com>

References:
- RE: agenda items for SF ? ISPs document
  - From: "MicklesCK" <MicklesCK@aol.com>

Prev by Date: Re: agenda items for v6ops in San Francisco
Next by Date: Re: agenda items for SF ? ISPs document
Previous by thread: Re: agenda items for SF ? ISPs document
Next by thread: Re: agenda items for SF ? ISPs document
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread