Re: agenda items for v6ops in San Francisco

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

> > As a general note, I think we should try to discuss "transition
> > architecture" in a more aggregated fashion: now it has spread all 
> > over the
> > analysis documents (consider e.g. NAT/PT vs dual-stack etc.).
> >
> > One way trying to get some coherence here might be to try to have some
> > discussion (like 10-20 mins) on some specific topics before (or 
> > after) the
> > scenarios.
> this has some appeal.  also, i think a generic discussion of they 
> types of
> security issues raised by transition mechanisms might be worthwhile.  i
> suspect that we would benefit from a common and consistent story for 
> both of
> these.
I agree with Randy and Pekka, but a small remark - what do we want the 
outcome to be? An I-D containing an overview aka the site-local I-Ds?

- kurtis -