Re: agenda items for v6ops in San Francisco

[Randy Bush <randy@iij.com>]

> As a general note, I think we should try to discuss "transition
> architecture" in a more aggregated fashion: now it has spread all over the
> analysis documents (consider e.g. NAT/PT vs dual-stack etc.).  
> 
> One way trying to get some coherence here might be to try to have some
> discussion (like 10-20 mins) on some specific topics before (or after) the
> scenarios.

this has some appeal.  also, i think a generic discussion of they types of
security issues raised by transition mechanisms might be worthwhile.  i
suspect that we would benefit from a common and consistent story for both of
these.

randy