Re: agenda items for v6ops in San Francisco

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

Randy Bush wrote:
> 
> > As a general note, I think we should try to discuss "transition
> > architecture" in a more aggregated fashion: now it has spread all over the
> > analysis documents (consider e.g. NAT/PT vs dual-stack etc.).
> >
> > One way trying to get some coherence here might be to try to have some
> > discussion (like 10-20 mins) on some specific topics before (or after) the
> > scenarios.
> 
> this has some appeal.  also, i think a generic discussion of they types of
> security issues raised by transition mechanisms might be worthwhile.  i
> suspect that we would benefit from a common and consistent story for both of
> these.

I'd say this argues for a second session. I don't see it fitting into
anything like 20 minutes.

   Brian