[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Document Review: Volunteers Needed
At 01:25 PM 3/7/2003 +0100, Ronald van der Pol wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 22:33:55 -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> The recent poor response to our document last calls (2
> comments for one document, 4 comments for the other) is
> insufficient to justify advancing these documents to the
> IESG.
I think we all agree.
Good.
> In an effort to fix this problem, Bob, Itojun and I are
> considering forming a semi-official v6ops document review team.
That's a big step at once. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think
the recent Last Call was the first that said: "Silence does NOT
indicate consent during this phase." Apparently, that was not
enough or people did not read it. Maybe you could first try
to send reminders like: "People, we need more feedback on this
draft otherwise we are not going to advance it". I know that
would work for me :-) With formal review teams I am afraid we
are going to spend more time on procedures than on actual work.
I was hoping that we could do this in a way that is very
light-weight regarding procedures. It would add a little
overhead for me, Itojun and Bob, but not much to the whole
WG.
What, in particular, are you concerned about?
Margaret