[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Document Review: Volunteers Needed

To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: Document Review: Volunteers Needed
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:47:05 +0100
Cc: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, Bob Fink <bob@thefinks.com>, Itojun <itojun@iijlab.net>
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20030307104041.00bc9060@mail.windriver.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030305223135.0345c138@mail.windriver.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20030305223135.0345c138@mail.windriver.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20030307104041.00bc9060@mail.windriver.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:45:04 -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:

> I was hoping that we could do this in a way that is very
> light-weight regarding procedures.  It would add a little
> overhead for me, Itojun and Bob, but not much to the whole
> WG.

That sounds good.

> What, in particular, are you concerned about?

Several procedural issues have already been raised. I just think a
review team is an overkill at this moment. I think with a little
pressure we can get enough Last Call replies. Jim made a important
observation about the number of volunteers already for a review team.

	rvdp

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Document Review: Volunteers Needed
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- Document Review: Volunteers Needed
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
- Re: Document Review: Volunteers Needed
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>

Prev by Date: RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-unman-scenarios-00.txt
Next by Date: Send Review Comments NOW!!!
Previous by thread: Re: Document Review: Volunteers Needed
Next by thread: Re: Document Review: Volunteers Needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread