RE: Note on Scenarios for IPv6

[Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>]

> What should the _scenario_ documents include? (And what not.)
> What should the _solutions_ documents include? (And what not.)
>
> This seems to be a critical thing to have a common understanding on.
Actually, I'm not so sure that this is critical...

The division of this work in to two documents is somewhat
artificial.  The idea is to have a first document, scenarios,
that describes the possible scenarios for introducing IPv6 into
a particular environment, and a second document, analysis, that
analyzes which coexistance mechanisms (existing or to be
developed) are needed for each scenario.

The enterprise, 3GPP and unmanaged docs all do include
discussion of where IPv6 will be introduced/available in
the scenarios document, and they break down the scenarios
that way, so it would be best if the ISP document is consistent
with them.

However, the _critical_ goal is to get to an end-state where
we understand which coexistence mechanisms are needed and
how/when they should be used.

Margaret