[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt

To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Subject: Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:57:01 +0200
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0307160308390.11175-100000@blue.seas.upenn.edu><20030716100816.X270@vagabond.imslab.net><20030716082336.GJ26779@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk><05c901c34b75$ee749360$eb88a051@consulintel.es><20030716121924.R67740@Space.Net><085b01c34b85$2536d570$eb88a051@consulintel.es>

> A R&D funded project can never be involved in commercial transit, that's
> clear.

uh, this is patently not the case in some stateside r&e funded networks

randy

References:
- Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
  - From: HELENA RUTE SOFIA <rsofia@seas.upenn.edu>
- Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
  - From: Jasminko Mulahusic <jasko@fakat.com>
- Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
  - From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
  - From: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
- Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
- Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
  - From: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>

Prev by Date: RE: 6to4 vs forwarding IP proto41 in NAT
Next by Date: "IPv6 on by default" comment
Previous by thread: Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: comment on draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread