Draft agenda for v6ops Minneapolis

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

Hi,

Find below the first draft agenda for v6ops slots in Minneapolis.  There 
will still be modifications to it, but we thought it would be appropriate 
to give a sneak peek as soon as possible, and to solicitate comments etc. 
on the agenda contents.

Note that we've used a bit more verbose format in the draft agenda, trying
to help people focus on what's the goal of each agenda item.

Thanks,

 Pekka, Jonne & Bob
  v6ops co-chairs

-------

*DRAFT*

v6ops agenda for Minneapolis IETF
---------------------------------
(We've requested for 2.5h + 2.0h slots, but due to scheduling
conflicts, they haven't yet appeared on the draft agenda.)

First slot, 2h
==============

Introduction and agenda bashing - 5 mins, Chairs/Pekka

Process issues for the working group, 10-15 mins, Chairs/Jonne
  - Introduce the changes/enhancements to the WG process.
  - [more details to come..]
  - GOAL: enable WG to work more effectively

Document status - 5-10 mins, Chairs/Pekka
  - What has happened with WG documents lately
  - GOAL: show the status of WG documents

3GPP Analysis Issues discussion, 15 mins, J. Wiljakka
 - draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-analysis-06.txt [maybe updated]
 - Go through the open issues raised before and during the last call, 
   try to solicit comments from the WG.
 - GOAL: try to gain some form of consensus on the issues, to be ready 
   to ship the document to the IESG after revision in Dec 2003.

ISP Scenarios/Solutions, 30 mins, Chairs/Pekka, M. Lind, V. Ksinant (either one or both)
 - draft-lind-v6ops-isp-scenarios-01.txt
 - draft-ksinant-v6ops-isp-analysis-00.txt
 - present changes, solicit discussion
 - try to get meta discussion what the WG actually wants to do in ISP space
 - GOAL: Show the latest developments in ISP space, get WG to discuss what
   to do to move forward.  Adapt both as WG documents.

Enterprise Scenarios discussion, 20 mins, Y. Pouffary, or someone else?
 - draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-00.txt
 - 5-10 mins presentation, the rest discussion
 - present changes to the draft
 - bring up the points where WG input would be useful, discuss those
 - GOAL: allow the WG to go give input on the document, and help it go
   forward.

Unmanaged Connectivity Tradeoffs discussion, 30 mins, R. van der Pol, or T. Chown
 - draft-chown-v6ops-unmanaged-connectivity-00.txt
 - 10 mins presentation, 20 mins discussion
 - describe the connectivity issues currently blocking the 
   unmanaged solutions document, discuss tradeoffs
 - GOAL: try to get useful discussion on the tradeoffs of connectivity.  Get
   input whether this is the right direction to go to solve these issues.


The second slot, 2.5h
=====================

Agenda bashing - 5 mins, Chairs/Jonne
 
IPv4 Survey drafts status report - 5-10 mins, Chairs/Pekka
 - 
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-apps-03.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-int-02.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-04.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-ops-03.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-routing-02.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-sec-02.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-subip-03.txt
	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-trans-03.txt
 - present the status of IPv4 survey documents
 - GOAL: present status, try to get people involved in finishing up the
   drafts

Transition mechanisms update, 15 mins, Erik Nordmark or Chairs/Pekka
 - [to-be-revised:] draft-ietf-v6ops-mech-v2-01.txt
 - present the changes, 5 mins; discussion of issues, 10 mins
 - GOAL: Consensus on the changes, prepare for WG last call, 
   decision whether changes are OK to qualify for going to Draft Standard.

IPv6 Applications Transition - 20 mins, Myung-Ki Shin
 - draft-shin-v6ops-application-transition-02.txt
 - 5 minutes base presentation
 - 5 minutes framing the discussion
 - 10 minutes discussion
 - GOAL: adopt as WG document, provoke discussion on application porting
   guidelines

IPv6-on-by-Default/On-link-bydefault tradeoffs - 25 mins, Sebastien Roy
 - draft-ietf-v6ops-v6onbydefault-00.txt
 - draft-ietf-v6ops-onlinkassumption-00.txt
 - 5-10 minutes presentation/changes
 - 15 minutes discussion
 - GOAL: discuss changes since the last version, first time as WG document
 - GOAL: make clear how to proceed with the onlinkassumption document.

IPv6 Firewalling Considerations, 10 mins, Pekka Savola
 - draft-savola-v6ops-firewalling-02.txt
 - 5 minutes presentation/changes
 - 5 minutes discussion, if there are any open issues
 - GOAL: see whether the WG wants to adapt as WG item for Informational RFC.

IPv6 Renumbering Procedures, 20 mins, Fred Baker
 - draft-baker-ipv6-renumber-procedure-01.txt
 - 5-10 mins presentation, 10 mins discussion of the issues
 - GOAL: adapt as WG document, discuss how to make renumbering easier.

SIIT/NAT-PT Applicability Statement - 15 mins, Suresh Satapati (or someone else)
 - draft-satapati-v6ops-natpt-applicability-00.txt
 - 5 minutes presentation, 10 minutes discussion especially the major issues 
   where the DT was divided
 - GOAL: provoke discussion on NAT-PT/SIIT and generic translation, see
   how the WG likes the document

Experiences with Dual Stack Service - 15 mins, Yasuhiro Shirasaki
 - draft-shirasaki-dualstack-service-02.txt
 - 5-10 minutes presentation
 - 5 minutes discussion
 - GOAL: disseminate how dual-stack access service has been deployed already.
   (Authors pursue the individual Informational RFC path.)