Re: spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:01:56AM +0900, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> 
> 	thererefore, i'm thinking of submitting a draft which describes what
> 	we (IIJ, AS2497) did to deploy IPv6 backbone as well as IPv6 services.
> 
> 	before start writing stuff up, my question is:
> 	- does it sound useful?

Yes, we had such a draft presented this week.  Another would not hurt.

> 	- doesn't it jeopadize ISP analysis/scenario effort, or is it okay to
> 	  have generalized analysis/scneario doc and specific-ISP doc in
> 	  parallel?

I think it is good to have.

> 	- if it is useful, can other ISP/enterprise/whatever do the similar
> 	  thing?

I don't see why not.  Where the draft ended up in the process is a different
question (it would be a personal draft for reference only, I assume), but
the dissemination would be very useful.
 
Tim