[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]
Pekka Savola wrote:
5. Publish Informational or BCP RFCs [...]
... a draft does not fulfill that criteria. IESG approval on document
probably would be interpreted to be it. Working group last call with no
issues raised is stretch but could maybe be considered, but anything
prior to that would be clearly premature.
Of course, it's OK to work on the subjects in parallel, maybe even using
the mailing list if it's nonintrusive, but one should definitely not
expect them to become official WG items prematurely.
Then, let's have ISATAP as a WG item; it's been around for three
years and there is nothing premature about that. (Better yet would
be to just go ahead and publish it NOW.)
I want ISATAP as a work of the IETF as it should be so that we
can declare success together. Let's get on board with the new
technology before the real world passes us by.
Thanks - Fred
ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com