Re: spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Why you keep going with 5 and 6 if 1 is clear ?

You asked about parallel work:

> > While I agree in the importance of the analysis word, and I try to spend
> > some of my time on it, there is nothing in the charter that doesn't
> > allow to continue other works in parallel, that doesn't define new
> > transition mechanism. By the way, I'm still waiting your reply on this
> > to my previous email.

and I responded.

> You insist in the charter, and I'm reading the charter, starting with 1 ...

At least without major modifications, I do not see this draft to belong 
under 1).

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings