Re: spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]

["JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>]

> At least without major modifications, I do not see this draft to belong 
> under 1).

Based on what ? Quite a subjective observation, and I think is quite wrong for a chair to take a subjective position.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 5:52 AM
Subject: Re: spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]


> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> > Why you keep going with 5 and 6 if 1 is clear ?
> 
> You asked about parallel work:
> 
> > > While I agree in the importance of the analysis word, and I try to spend
> > > some of my time on it, there is nothing in the charter that doesn't
> > > allow to continue other works in parallel, that doesn't define new
> > > transition mechanism. By the way, I'm still waiting your reply on this
> > > to my previous email.
> 
> and I responded.
> 
> > You insist in the charter, and I'm reading the charter, starting with 1 ...
> 
> At least without major modifications, I do not see this draft to belong 
> under 1).
> 
> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>

**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.