[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3gpp-analysis-07: (semi-)editorial issues

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: 3gpp-analysis-07: (semi-)editorial issues
From: Jasminko Mulahusic <jasko@fakat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:58:56 +0100
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311151429470.11490-100000@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311151429470.11490-100000@netcore.fi>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3


    If an application can use both IPv4 and IPv6, and IPv6 PDP contexts are
    available, it is preferable to try IPv6 communication first.

i don't like this 'try ipv6' paradigm. either ipv6 is there and is working without i need to try it, or it is not there and is not working. how many times do i have to try it before i will think it stinks and will stop trying and simply disable it and stick to ipv4?

jasminko

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3gpp-analysis-07: (semi-)editorial issues
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- 3gpp-analysis-07: (semi-)editorial issues
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: onlinkassumption-00 comments
Next by Date: Re: spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]
Previous by thread: 3gpp-analysis-07: (semi-)editorial issues
Next by thread: Re: 3gpp-analysis-07: (semi-)editorial issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread