Re: spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]

[Jasminko Mulahusic <jasko@fakat.com>]

itojun,

> 	thererefore, i'm thinking of submitting a draft which describes what
> 	we (IIJ, AS2497) did to deploy IPv6 backbone as well as IPv6 services.
>
> 	before start writing stuff up, my question is:
> 	- does it sound useful?
> 	- doesn't it jeopadize ISP analysis/scenario effort, or is it okay to
> 	  have generalized analysis/scneario doc and specific-ISP doc in
> 	  parallel?
> 	- if it is useful, can other ISP/enterprise/whatever do the similar
> 	  thing?

yes, that would be very useful. my question is: can your work somehow be 
combined as an example within the existing scenarios/solutions draft 
that the isp design team is working on?

hopefully, what you have done will agree with what the team proposes and 
if that would not be the case, it would be interesting to see why/how 
theory and practice differ.

jasminko