[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISATAP spec stability [Re: ISATAP and admin/IP domains]

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: ISATAP spec stability [Re: ISATAP and admin/IP domains]
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:09:26 +0000
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311202001070.9517-100000@netcore.fi>
Mail-followup-to: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
References: <079501c3af8d$2f562490$870a0a0a@consulintel.es> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311202001070.9517-100000@netcore.fi>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 08:46:18PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> > Sorry to say this, but I completely agree with Fred. Do you want a
> > few examples ?
> 
> Sorry for the statistics; maybe they didn't convey enough information.
> Of course, there is no problem issuing drafts when things get fixed.  

Hi Pekka,

Fair point.

Any chance you could re-forward your most recent analysis of ISATAP?
(Even if it has changed 44% since :)

Thanks,
Tim

References:
- Re: ISATAP spec stability [Re: ISATAP and admin/IP domains]
  - From: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
- Re: ISATAP spec stability [Re: ISATAP and admin/IP domains]
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-intro-05.txt
Next by Date: Re: spending time on analysis [Re: draft-palet-v6ops-proto41-nat-03 as WG item]
Previous by thread: Re: ISATAP spec stability [Re: ISATAP and admin/IP domains]
Next by thread: RE: manual config of UE tunnel [RE: 3gpp-analysis: Recommendation on tunneling in the UE]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread