Re: Work on MPLS and tunneling approaches in scenarios

[Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>]

I would suggest that the chairs and ADs think for a few minutes
about whether these items belong in v6ops or in an ad hoc WG
(v6tuns?).

   Brian

Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> (co-chair hat on)
> 
> At v6ops meeting on Monday, there seemed to be rough consensus that:
> 
>  - IPv6 in MPLS networks work is carried forward, (some objection)
>  - "Opportunistic" tunneling work needs to go forward, (minor objection)
>  - "Zero-configured" tunneling work needs to go forward. (unanimous)
> 
> (Unfortunately, the latter two are a bit fuzzy concepts.)
> 
> This is message is sent to verify the rough consensus in the WG.  If
> you have objections, please raise them now.
> 
> For those not attending, the slides of the presentation are
> temporarily available at:
> 
> http:/www.netcore.fi/pekkas/ietf/temp/v6ops-mpls.pdf
> http:/www.netcore.fi/pekkas/ietf/temp/v6ops-tunneling.pdf
> 
> (Sorry, no minutes yet.)

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter 
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM