Re: Work on MPLS and tunneling approaches in scenarios

[Jasminko Mulahusic <jasko@fakat.com>]

> At v6ops meeting on Monday, there seemed to be rough consensus that:
>
>  - IPv6 in MPLS networks work is carried forward, (some objection)
>  - "Opportunistic" tunneling work needs to go forward, (minor objection)
>  - "Zero-configured" tunneling work needs to go forward. (unanimous)
>
> (Unfortunately, the latter two are a bit fuzzy concepts.)
>
> This is message is sent to verify the rough consensus in the WG.  If
> you have objections, please raise them now.
>

i think we are moving a bit fast here.

following would be a more reasonable way to go:

1/ finish scenario/analysis work.
2/ review the results of that work and see if there are any missing
mechanisms.
3/ document those missing pieces along with their requirements, potential
usage cases, etc.
4/ ask the wg/ad:s how/where to proceed. [and as brian pointed out, maybe
a new wg might be a better place].

now, nobody has said that some of the above cannot be done i parallel, but
doing 4/ without finishing 1/ first seems premature thing to do. imho. why
such a hurry?

jasminko